| 000 | 019820000a22004570004500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c86921 _d86921 |
||
| 003 | CR-TuBCO | ||
| 005 | 20220328104920.0 | ||
| 007 | ta | ||
| 008 | 220328b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aCR-TuBCO _cCR-TuBCO _bEs |
||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 |
_a633.73 _bG328 |
| 100 | 1 |
_985180 _aLashermes, P. |
|
| 100 | 1 |
_9125624 _aTrouslot, P. |
|
| 100 | 1 |
_943095 _aAnthony, F. |
|
| 100 | 1 |
_958486 _aCombes, M.C. |
|
| 100 | 1 |
_956635 _aCharrier, A. |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 | _aGenetic diversity for RAPD markers between cultivated and wild accessions of Coffea arabica |
| 260 | _c1996 | ||
| 270 | _aSan José, C.R. | ||
| 500 | _a3 fig. 2 tab. 25 ref. Sum. (En) | ||
| 520 | _aRandom amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers have been successfully employed to analyse the genetic diversity among cultivated and subspontaneous accessions of Coffea arabica. The narrow genetic base of commercial cultivars was confirmed. On the other hand, a relatively large genetic diversity was observed within the germplasm collection demonstrating the importance of collecting missions. Results suggested an East-West differentiation in Ethiophia, the primary centre of diversification of C. arabica. The large heterosis effect reported in intergroup hybrids could be related to such genetic differentiation. RAPD method appeared to be effective in resolving genetic variations and in grouping germplasm in C. arabica | ||
| 650 | 1 | 4 |
_9140993 _aCOFFEA ARABICA |
| 650 | 1 | 4 |
_9153996 _aMARCADORES GENETICOS |
| 650 | 1 | 4 |
_9168058 _aVARIACION GENETICA |
| 650 | 1 | 4 |
_9156703 _aORGANISMOS INDIGENOS |
| 691 |
_9140993 _aCOFFEA ARABICA |
||
| 691 |
_9149033 _aGENETIC MARKERS |
||
| 691 |
_9320466 _aGENETIC VARIATION |
||
| 691 |
_9151124 _aINDIGENOUS ORGANISMS |
||
| 773 | 0 |
_tEuphytica (Países Bajos) _d1996 _gv. 87 p. 59-64 |
|
| 901 | _aF30 | ||
| 903 | _aE | ||
| 903 | _aV | ||
| 904 | _aBCO | ||
| 905 | _aC | ||
| 906 | _a19970101 | ||
| 908 | _aJ | ||
| 942 |
_cANA _2z |
||