| 000 | 02595nam a22003377a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c151044 _d151044 |
||
| 003 | CR-SiIICA | ||
| 005 | 20230703181204.0 | ||
| 007 | ta | ||
| 008 | 230703t2004 ||||| |||| 00| 0 spa d | ||
| 040 |
_aCR-SiIICA _beng |
||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aAllen, A.G | ||
| 100 |
_aCardoso, A.A _954091 |
||
| 100 | _ada Rocha, G.O | ||
| 245 | _aInfluence of sugar cane burning on aerosol soluble ion composition in Southeastern Brazil | ||
| 260 |
_bELSEVIER _c2004 |
||
| 270 | _aSan José, C.R. | ||
| 300 | _a14 páginas | ||
| 520 | _aSeasonal variability in the major soluble ion composition of atmospheric particulate matter in the principal sugar cane growing region of central Sao Paulo State indicates that pre-harvest burning of sugar cane plants is an important influence on the regional scale aerosol chemistry. Results indicated that the principal sources of the aerosols investigated were local or regional in nature (scale of tens to a few hundreds of km), and that differences between air masses of varying origins were small. Fine particles were typically acidic, containing secondary nitrates, sulphates and organic species. Coarse fraction concentrations were mainly influenced by physical parameters (wind speed, movement of vehicles and surface condition) affecting rates of re-suspension, although secondary nitrate and sulphate were also present in the larger particles. Concentrations of all measured species except sodium and chloride were higher during the burning season. Although concentrations were lower than often found in polluted urban environments, the massive increases during much of the year, due to a single anthropogenic activity (sugar cane burning) are indicative of a very large perturbation of the lower troposphere in the region relative to the natural condition. These aerosols are suspected of promoting respiratory disease. They also represent an important mechanism for the tropospheric transport of species relevant to surface acidification (sulphates, nitrates, ammonium and organic acids) and soil nutrient status (potassium, nitrogen, ammonium, calcium), so their impact on fragile natural ecosystems (following deposition) needs to be considered. | ||
| 650 | 0 |
_9304175 _aAEROSOLS |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_9323992 _aIONS |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_9165668 _aSUGAR CANE |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_9137969 _aBIOMASS |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aCAÑA DE AZUCAR _9139154 |
|
| 651 |
_aBRAZIL _922604 |
||
| 651 |
_aBRASIL _92040 |
||
| 787 |
_9352071 _aGCF CARICOM AgReady Reference |
||
| 856 |
_uhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.06.019 _yeng |
||
| 942 |
_2z _cRED |
||