000 036500000a22008170004500
999 _c127900
_d127900
003 CR-TuBCO
005 20211213172644.0
007 ta
008 210707t2000 ||||| |||| 00| 0 fre d
022 _a0854-9818
040 _aCR-TuBCO
_cCR-TuBCO
_bEspañol
041 0 _afre
100 1 _948977
_aBikié, H.
_eautor/a
100 1 _998845
_aNdoye, O.
_eautor/a
100 1 _9122362
_aSunderlin, W.E.
_eautor/a
245 1 0 _aL’impact de la crise économique sur les systèmes agricoles et le changement du couvert forestier dans la zone forestière humide du Cameroun
260 _aJakarta (Indonesia):
_bCIFOR,
_c2000
270 _aSan José, C.R.
300 _a21 páginas:
_b5 figuras, 5 tablas
440 _aOccasional Paper (CIFOR)
_n; no. 27
504 _aIncluye 39 referencias bibliográficas en las páginas 15-16
520 _aA sample survey of 648 households was conducted in 54 villages in the humid forest zone of Cameroon to understand the effect of the economic crisis (dating from 1986) and the 1994 currency devaluation on the practices of small farmers, and the effect of these practices on forest cover change. Four hypotheses were tested concerning: the balance between plantation crop and food crop production; the degree of market-orientation of food crop production; the gender division of labour; and the degree of dependence on non-timber forest products (NTFPs). Some key findings are: (1) the area of cocoa production has stagnated while that of coffee, plantain, and other food crops has tended to increase; (2) food crop production is now more market-oriented; (3) men are now far more involved in food crop production than in the past; (4) more households now exploit NTFPs than before but it remains a small source of income; and (5) in connection with these changes, there has been an overall increase in the rate of forest clearing by small farmers. The study concludes that economic crises and macroeconomic policies can have unexpected and powerful effects on land use and forest practices. Future policies aimed at improving forest conservation and management must take account of this fact.
650 1 4 _9166664
_aTHEOBROMA CACAO
650 1 4 _9140993
_aCOFFEA ARABICA
650 1 4 _9155563
_aMUSA
650 1 4 _9136468
_aARBOLES
650 1 4 _9134976
_aAGROFORESTERIA
650 1 4 _9164829
_aSISTEMAS DE CULTIVO
650 1 4 _9167870
_aUTILIZACION DE LA TIERRA
650 1 4 _9160425
_aPRODUCTOS FORESTALES NO LENOSOS
650 1 4 _9154480
_aMERCADEO
650 1 4 _9159934
_aPRECIOS
650 1 4 _9142718
_aCRISIS ECONOMICA
650 1 4 _9139106
_aCAMERUN
691 _9166664
_aTHEOBROMA CACAO
691 _9140993
_aCOFFEA ARABICA
691 _9155563
_aMUSA
691 _9167266
_aTREES
691 _9134979
_aAGROFORESTRY
691 _9142769
_aCROPPING SYSTEMS
691 _9152641
_aLAND USE
691 _9328719
_aNONWOOD FOREST PRODUCTS
691 _9154064
_aMARKETING
691 _9160082
_aPRICES
691 _9316037
_aECONOMIC CRISES
691 _9309275
_aCAMEROON
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/000629
_qpdf
_yfre
901 _aF08
902 _aK10
902 _aE70
903 _aE
904 _aklines
905 _aC
906 _a20111206
_b20111206
907 _a000007713
907 _a000001721
907 _a000004993
907 _a000007887
907 _a000000207
907 _a000001971
907 _a000004182
907 _a000005211
907 _a000004620
907 _a000006178
907 _a000002470
907 _a000001229
907 _dCA
908 _aB
942 _2z
_cDIG